Dr. Connor's Illusive Case File
What is in Dr. Connor’s custody evaluation case file that caused him to lie?
There are a few things in this world that are concrete and one of them is that Dr. Connor said his evaluation report contained numerous errors and oversights and he wanted to charge us to fix his mistakes. Another concrete thing is Dr. Ed Connor, Judge James D Humphrey, Judge Carl H Taul did everything in their power to obstruct my access to the case file of the evaluation with numerous errors and oversights. Dr. Connor can try to spin this any way he wants, but the following statements from Dr. Connor demonstrate that he doesn’t tell the truth. Another concrete thing is there is no protective order preventing the release of the case file and the file is not sealed. If there was information that could compromise the safety of my children, the file would have been sealed by now. The only thing compromised by the release of the case file are the jobs of a few “professionals.”
Dr. Connor’s contract said I was entitled to the case file. He said he couldn’t release it. Then he said he’d be happy to release it. Then he said he needed a court order to release it because I didn’t have an attorney. Then he said there said there were state and HIPAA laws that prevented him from releasing the file. When I had an attorney request the file, Dr. Connor told the attorney I already had the file but he would have a copy of the file by October 2, 2009. On October 2, 2009, Dr. Connor sent a fax to my attorney stating that he would not be able to release the file, Dr. Connor claimed I already had, because it had confidential information about other people. I am posting this information in an effort to prevent this from happening to other families. Dearborn Circuit Court Judge James D Humphrey wrote “The Court is most concerned about Husband’s irrational behavior and attacks on Dr. Connor.”
February 21, 2008 letter to Judge Taul
March 11, 2008 letter to Dan Brewington
March 26, 2008 letter to Dan Brewington
Dr. Connor’s April 16, 2008 Addendum to the custody evaluation. The contract that Dr. Connor refers to is the Provisions to Serve as an Impartial Expert in a Custody Evaluation. There was nothing impartial about it.
August 4, 2008 letter to Dan Brewington. This was when Dr. Connor began to claim that it was against the law to honor his contract and provide me with the file.
Dr. Connor’s December 22, 2008 letter to the Kentucky Board of Examiners of Psychology in response to the complaint I filed against Dr. Connor. Dr. Connor claims he has in no way obstructed my access to the case file. He claimed I signed the Provisions to Serve as an Impartial Expert in a Custody Evaluation which outlines the parameters of the evaluation. On April 16, Dr. Connor claimed the contract stated I was entitled to the case file.
September 21, 2009 letter to my attorney. Dr. Connor tells my attorney to get the case file from me because I already have a copy of the custody evaluation case file. Obviously Dr. Connor never provided me a copy of the file.
After my attorney informed Dr. Connor that he needed a copy of the evaluation case file that was certified by Dr. Connor’s office, Dr. Connor sent this letter dated September 28, 2009. I had my doubts when my attorney told me that Dr. Connor was going to release his file. I hope that everyone see’s Dr. Connor’s quote, “However, I am quite perplexed as to why this is necessary given that Mr. Brewington already has copies of all his records to/from our office.
Dr. Connor faxed this letter to my attorney on October 2, 2009. Nearly 20 months after I requested a copy of the evaluation case file, Dr. Connor is still making it up as he goes.
“After conducting a cursory review of the records you requested, it is apparent that there are numerous references to Mr. Brewington’s children by name as well as information about the mother interspersed throughout the documents.”
Dr. Connor acts as if he forgot who Dan Brewington even was. It’s unfortunate that Dr. Connor has resorted to playing “dumb” because I still can’t see my children because he won’t give me the case file.
The last time I met with Dr. Edward J Connor was on August 9, 2007. On August 29, 2007 Dr. Connor wrote:
“Currently, Dan has the children every Wednesday during the day and overnight and every Friday during the day and overnight and every third Monday during the day and overnight and equal weekend time.” “We see no reason why this schedule should not remain intact at this time.”
In the April 16, 2008 addendum to the custody evaluation, Dr. Connor wrote:
“In summary, we apologize for the errors noted above, but in the ‘bigger picture’ it remains our opinion that Mr. Brewington and [Ex] simply do not meet the criteria for joint custody.”
Dr. Connor never mentioned that I presented any kind of danger until he figured out that I wasn’t going to stop questioning why he was lying about releasing the case file. It wasn’t until September 10, 2008 that Dr. Connor started to claim that I may be “dangerous.” Over a year after the evaluation Dr. Connor came to the conclusion that I may be a danger. Click Here to find out what happens when psychologists attack.